Connect with us

Fuller House Can’t Escape the 90s

Published

on

 

[divider]

By: Jordan Brandes

Fuller House is an interesting experiment in unnecessary nostalgia. It’s not necessarily a bad show, there are far worse, there’s just no reason to exist outside of its first episode.

The show, which a direct continuation of the late 80s and early 90s sitcom staple Full House, brings the audience back into the lives of the Tanner household nearly 30 years later. This isn’t a bad idea and in fact rather fascinating since the finale back in 1995 was unsatisfying to so many fans. For those that don’t remember the show was essentially cut off mid-storyline and while it was still sweet and heartfelt seemed to be missing a satisfying conclusion.

That conclusion comes during the first episode of Fuller House. Suddenly all back in the same house all the main characters are ready to start their new lives in Los Angeles leaving the children (who are now in their 30s and have children of their own) behind.

The first 10 minutes or so of the first episode is almost entirely the original characters introducing themselves to the camera and essentially catching everyone up. It would be awkward if the original show weren’t kind of tailored to that kind of fourth wall breaking silliness.

By halfway through the first episode the writers seem to be going through their nostalgia checklist. Everyone says their famous catch phrase, John Stamos sings his famous song and the audience is now up-to-date on the lives of the Tanner family. It would have been an immensely satisfying conclusion if it had ended there but the show continues for a full 12 more episodes.

Let’s get one thing straight, nostalgia isn’t always a bad thing. Sometimes reviving old shows can be amazing and a great way to satisfy fans both old and new. Other times, such in the case of Fuller House, it just repeats a tired formula and adds nothing to the landscape.

Part of the charm of the original Full House was that it was a product of its era. It was intensely sweet and essentially harmless. The show led a large block of the TGIF lineup that ruled Friday nights in the 90s. But the forced laugh track and neutered world of the Reagan/Bush-era doesn’t hold up well under the modern microscope. That is not to say it was a more innocent time but television wasn’t nearly as daring.

Unfortunately it doesn’t really matter what modern critics say because Fuller House is critic-proof. With a gigantic built in fanbase the show is guaranteed at least three more seasons on Netflix. Hopefully in that time it will evolve some and step out of the shadow of its predecessor.

Continue Reading

Movie

‘Mufasa: The Lion King’ Will Leave You Breathless

Published

on

“Mufasa: The Lion King” is a visually stunning addition to the beloved Lion King franchise, offering a fresh and emotionally resonant take on the origins of one of Disney’s most iconic characters. The film beautifully explores Mufasa’s journey, balancing heartfelt moments with touches of comedy that lighten the mood and make the story accessible to audiences of all ages. The animation is breathtaking, capturing the vibrant landscapes and lush environments of the Pride Lands, adding depth to Mufasa’s character and his relationships.

The storytelling is compelling, effectively pulling at the heartstrings while providing insights into Mufasa’s character before he becomes the legendary king. However, the setup for Scar’s betrayal feels somewhat underdeveloped, lacking the deeper motivation that could have enriched their complex brotherly relationship. This missed opportunity leaves a slight gap in understanding Scar’s actions, which could have elevated the dramatic stakes.

The musical score is impressive, featuring memorable songs that enhance the emotional impact of pivotal scenes. While there are several standout tracks, one song, in particular, resonates deeply and is sure to linger in viewers’ minds long after the credits roll. Overall, “Mufasa: The Lion King” is an amazing film and a worthy addition to the Lion King lore that manages to deliver both laughter and tears, offering a rich tapestry of storytelling that fans will appreciate.

Continue Reading

Movie

Is ‘Kraven the Hunter’ a Total Letdown?

Published

on

“Kraven the Hunter,” directed by J.C. Chandor, aims to introduce a beloved Spider-Man villain to the big screen, but unfortunately, it falls short of expectations. The film suffers from noticeable issues, notably an overuse of ADR (Automated Dialogue Replacement), which detracts from the authenticity of the characters’ interactions and contributes to an uneven audio experience. This technical flaw is compounded by rough storytelling that feels disjointed and lacking in coherence, leaving viewers struggling to connect with the narrative.

Aaron Taylor-Johnson delivers a commendable performance as Kraven, showcasing the character’s gritty nature and complex motivations. His portrayal has potential, and it’s evident that he could elevate the character far beyond what is presented with a stronger script and direction. However, the absence of Spider-Man, a central figure in Kraven’s lore, leaves a void that the film struggles to fill. Without this critical connection, the plot meanders and fails to create the tension or stakes that fans of the superhero genre crave.

Additionally, including Rhino as a villain feels like a missed opportunity; he is presented more as a gag character with limited screen time, undermining any sense of threat or depth. For the average moviegoer, “Kraven the Hunter” might entertain but ultimately feels like a mediocre viewing experience. Comic book fans, however, may find disappointment in this lackluster attempt to create a solo character film. Instead of an exhilarating dive into Kraven’s world, the film presents a watered-down version, leaving audiences wishing for a more cohesive vision that honors its comic book roots.

Continue Reading

Movie

A Brief Review and History of A Year Without a Santa Claus

Published

on

A Year Without a Santa Claus, the 1974 stop-motion holiday classic produced by Rankin/Bass, is a heartwarming and whimsical tale that has cemented its place in holiday traditions. Based on Phyllis McGinley’s 1956 book, the story revolves around a disheartened Santa Claus who, feeling unappreciated, decides to take a year off from his Christmas duties. It’s up to Mrs. Claus and a pair of well-meaning elves, Jingle and Jangle, to reignite the Christmas spirit and show Santa the world’s unwavering belief in him.

The movie is beloved for its unforgettable characters, especially the bickering Miser Brothers, Snow Miser and Heat Miser. Their catchy, vaudeville-style musical numbers, “Snow Miser Song” and “Heat Miser Song”, are so iconic they’ve become cultural touchstones, often parodied and celebrated decades later.

Directed by Arthur Rankin Jr. and Jules Bass, the film continues the duo’s tradition of stop-motion magic, blending heartfelt storytelling with quirky humor. The voice cast, featuring Mickey Rooney as Santa and Shirley Booth as Mrs. Claus, delivers standout performances. Booth’s warm narration was her final acting role before retirement, adding a layer of poignancy to the film.

Initially released on December 10, 1974, on ABC, the special didn’t immediately achieve the legendary status of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. However, it gained a dedicated following through annual holiday airings, nostalgic appeal, and its distinct charm.

The film’s themes of hope, unity, and rekindling joy remain timeless, making it a perennial favorite for audiences of all ages. Its blend of humor, catchy songs, and a touching message about believing in magic and goodwill ensures its enduring legacy during the holiday season.

For fans of holiday classics, A Year Without a Santa Claus is a must-watch that never fails to warm hearts and spread cheer.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2012 - 2024 That's My Entertainment