Synopsis: In the world of Fae and man, a terrible war is taking place. The Pact has conquered the majority and Fairies are desperately trying to find a safe place to call home. Spurned by man no matter where they go, they deal with awful living conditions and harsh restrictions reminiscent of immigration in America in the 1800’s.
A young Fae woman who fought in the war and her former lover, now a detective, are reunited as one struggles to solve a string of grisly murders and the other tries to find her place in the world.
Ok, seriously, who in the hell is the Pact? What is their deal? Why did they decide to start slaughtering fairies and their allies and take control of their lands? I feel like I missed something, maybe a season one? I need more context. They are supposed to be this awful group just murdering people with wanton abandon (think Nazis) and we have NO information about them! How am I supposed to get on board with this “the pact is evil” train when I don’t know who or what they are? Is that the main story line? There are so many sub stories going on in each episode that if you aren’t careful, you will miss something important. I think.
I feel like I spent most of the first 4 episodes saying to myself “who in the hell is this guy??” and “what is happening now!!?”
While I really like Orlando Bloom, something was off about him as Philo. It just wasn’t believable. It’s almost like they wanted him because of his amazing performance in Lord of the Rings and hoped he would bring the same energy and life to this show. It didn’t work for me. It came off as weird and forced and I struggled to remain focused when he was talking. (my mind kept wandering).
Cara Delevingne was ok as Vignette, but not great in my opinion. She was supposed to be a strong, fierce fairy woman fighting off the evils of the world but, she just comes across like a petulant teenager shouting at her parents.
It feels like this show is trying to give us another Game of Thrones experience complete with brutal imagery, betrayals and (almost) rape/incest scenes however, it just plods along with no strong, stable central storyline.
The whole show has a very “Sherlock Holmes” (Guy Richie not BBC) quality to it, I really enjoy how they use darkness and shadow to convey deeper, more sinister feelings. Its gloomy and foggy with a genuine 19th century feel to it.
The artistry behind the characters is stunning. If you are in to fantasy, you will like how much detail and thought was put in to the different fairy creatures. These aren’t the same old trolls and dwarves etc. that are prominent in the majority of fantasy shows/movies produced in the last 20 years. The creativity and originality should be recognized and applauded.
Hats off to Tamzin Merchant for her masterful performance as Imogen Spurnrose. She gives us a character that is truly unpleasant and yet, we can’t help but like her as she becomes stronger and more confident in herself. She begins to realize that she may have been wrong about her opinion of Fae and gracefully navigates her own inner turmoil transforming into a character that gives the episodes the boost they need.
This is a show filled with huge talent so it could have been so much more than it is.
Conclusion:
A word of caution, if you have a weak stomach or don’t like graphic, brutal imagery then a few scenes will be a bit too much for you. There are murders and there are some sexually explicit scenes that aren’t suitable for younger viewers.
I really wanted to enjoy Carnival Row. I think that the concept was great but, the flat main characters and completely predictable story line tanked it for me. Its full of obvious political statements and potentially controversial subplots which will be ok for some viewers but perhaps not others who are looking for an escape from our current reality.
Movie
‘Mufasa: The Lion King’ Will Leave You Breathless
“Mufasa: The Lion King” is a visually stunning addition to the beloved Lion King franchise, offering a fresh and emotionally resonant take on the origins of one of Disney’s most iconic characters. The film beautifully explores Mufasa’s journey, balancing heartfelt moments with touches of comedy that lighten the mood and make the story accessible to audiences of all ages. The animation is breathtaking, capturing the vibrant landscapes and lush environments of the Pride Lands, adding depth to Mufasa’s character and his relationships.
The storytelling is compelling, effectively pulling at the heartstrings while providing insights into Mufasa’s character before he becomes the legendary king. However, the setup for Scar’s betrayal feels somewhat underdeveloped, lacking the deeper motivation that could have enriched their complex brotherly relationship. This missed opportunity leaves a slight gap in understanding Scar’s actions, which could have elevated the dramatic stakes.
The musical score is impressive, featuring memorable songs that enhance the emotional impact of pivotal scenes. While there are several standout tracks, one song, in particular, resonates deeply and is sure to linger in viewers’ minds long after the credits roll. Overall, “Mufasa: The Lion King” is an amazing film and a worthy addition to the Lion King lore that manages to deliver both laughter and tears, offering a rich tapestry of storytelling that fans will appreciate.
Movie
Is ‘Kraven the Hunter’ a Total Letdown?
“Kraven the Hunter,” directed by J.C. Chandor, aims to introduce a beloved Spider-Man villain to the big screen, but unfortunately, it falls short of expectations. The film suffers from noticeable issues, notably an overuse of ADR (Automated Dialogue Replacement), which detracts from the authenticity of the characters’ interactions and contributes to an uneven audio experience. This technical flaw is compounded by rough storytelling that feels disjointed and lacking in coherence, leaving viewers struggling to connect with the narrative.
Aaron Taylor-Johnson delivers a commendable performance as Kraven, showcasing the character’s gritty nature and complex motivations. His portrayal has potential, and it’s evident that he could elevate the character far beyond what is presented with a stronger script and direction. However, the absence of Spider-Man, a central figure in Kraven’s lore, leaves a void that the film struggles to fill. Without this critical connection, the plot meanders and fails to create the tension or stakes that fans of the superhero genre crave.
Additionally, including Rhino as a villain feels like a missed opportunity; he is presented more as a gag character with limited screen time, undermining any sense of threat or depth. For the average moviegoer, “Kraven the Hunter” might entertain but ultimately feels like a mediocre viewing experience. Comic book fans, however, may find disappointment in this lackluster attempt to create a solo character film. Instead of an exhilarating dive into Kraven’s world, the film presents a watered-down version, leaving audiences wishing for a more cohesive vision that honors its comic book roots.
Movie
A Brief Review and History of A Year Without a Santa Claus
A Year Without a Santa Claus, the 1974 stop-motion holiday classic produced by Rankin/Bass, is a heartwarming and whimsical tale that has cemented its place in holiday traditions. Based on Phyllis McGinley’s 1956 book, the story revolves around a disheartened Santa Claus who, feeling unappreciated, decides to take a year off from his Christmas duties. It’s up to Mrs. Claus and a pair of well-meaning elves, Jingle and Jangle, to reignite the Christmas spirit and show Santa the world’s unwavering belief in him.
The movie is beloved for its unforgettable characters, especially the bickering Miser Brothers, Snow Miser and Heat Miser. Their catchy, vaudeville-style musical numbers, “Snow Miser Song” and “Heat Miser Song”, are so iconic they’ve become cultural touchstones, often parodied and celebrated decades later.
Directed by Arthur Rankin Jr. and Jules Bass, the film continues the duo’s tradition of stop-motion magic, blending heartfelt storytelling with quirky humor. The voice cast, featuring Mickey Rooney as Santa and Shirley Booth as Mrs. Claus, delivers standout performances. Booth’s warm narration was her final acting role before retirement, adding a layer of poignancy to the film.
Initially released on December 10, 1974, on ABC, the special didn’t immediately achieve the legendary status of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. However, it gained a dedicated following through annual holiday airings, nostalgic appeal, and its distinct charm.
The film’s themes of hope, unity, and rekindling joy remain timeless, making it a perennial favorite for audiences of all ages. Its blend of humor, catchy songs, and a touching message about believing in magic and goodwill ensures its enduring legacy during the holiday season.
For fans of holiday classics, A Year Without a Santa Claus is a must-watch that never fails to warm hearts and spread cheer.