There are some movies, like people, that seem determined to please. Peter Farrelly’s Green Book is such a film. Though most people-pleasing fare is light and buoyant, Green Book’s subject matter is not, though its style is.
It’s based on a true musical tour in the 1960s of the Midwest and Jim Crow deep south by the Jamaican born pianist and composer, Don Shirley (Mahershala Ali). At the time, Shirley, a classical oriented musician and composer, was playing a style of music, accompanied by a cellist and bassist, that fell in-between most traditional categories. It was too classical for jazz, too jazzy for classical, too pop for either. Popular primarily with white audiences, or so the movie would have you believe, it was both virtuosic and people pleasing. Shirley’s actual body of work is wildly diverse and singular, as intelligent as its creator.
But this movie is not overly interested in the music, and only passingly interested in Dr. Shirley. The music and the man is a means to an end. And the end is always to please.
The film is focused on the relationship between Don Shirley and his driver/security, Tony Vallelonga aka Tony Lip. A former bouncer, Tony Lip (Viggo Mortensen) is an easygoing but quick to throw a punch (and follow it up with a few more) Italian-American from New York, who takes on any number of odd jobs, even ones that require him to be away for an eight week tour just before Christmas, and some which require mixing with mob figures but never committing, all to put food on the table for a much loved wife and a pair of young boys.
Tony begins the film about as racist as one would expect from a man of his time and sub-culture, which is a vague description but just about as vague as it’s played out in the film. In a scene early on where he’s confronted with two glasses out of which two black handymen have drank, he pauses long enough before throwing them away to tell us his racism is not to the bone. And that practically is the end of the examination of Tony. He’s put off by the Jim Crow inequalities; put off by the hypocrisy of the genteel white folk who applaud Shirley but won’t dine with him, etc. All reactions that make him suitably likable.
But as for a thoughtful look at Tony’s character, after accepting the job — the money is more important than any social issue — Tony’s attitudes towards race are nearly taken off the table. He’s a loyal employee with a growing appreciation and affection for his talented boss. More than anything, he’s a nice guy.
Viggo Mortensen plays Tony right on the edge of stereotype. He’s too good an actor, and Farrelly is clearly aiming higher than Dumb and Dumber in this prestige-hungry film, to push him over the edge, but he’s unmistakably a type. One gets the impression that Mortensen was aching to go deeper, but the script, written tellingly by Tony’s son, along with Farrelly and Brian Hayes Currie, is more interested in moving the story along than getting into the heart of it. And it wants to make Tony a lovable hero. What son would want to do anything different?
As a result, the film aims directly at scenes that put a glow both on the characters and in the audience’s heart. To do this though, the villains have to be easily recognizable and at times, like the bar scene with the racists, shallowly acted, and most crisis solved with a combination of loyalty and humor. This is, at its core, a buddy film.
Which brings us back to Dr. Don Shirley. He was in truth a remarkable man. He held three doctorates, studied at the Leningrad Conservatory of Music at the age of nine, spoke 8 languages, wrote symphonies: A real prodigy. We learn all of this exposition from the character himself, but we rarely get beneath the credentials and accomplishments.
Who is Don Shirley? The film teases us. Mahershala’s restrained and dignified performance, like Mortensen’s flamboyant performance, aches to go further and deeper. The film skips along the surface of his conflicted relationships with whites and blacks, with his sexual orientation, with his isolation, but there is other chicken to fry. Yes, there is a scene, two scenes actually, about fried chicken. Kentucky Fried Chicken even. The scenes play off each other well; they make their point.
But the complexity of Dr. Shirley, to say nothing of the complexity of race in America, is not on this film’s itinerary. Rather, it’s a quick swing through the South, which it’s surface antagonisms (the Green Book of the title is a guide to safe tourism for African-Americans, which hotels will house them, which restaurants will serve them), and a warm return to a cozy, celebratory dinner around the New York family table. Nearly all the stops are predictable and designed to please and satisfy: Two wildly different men become friends; And all the feel-good touches are along for the ride. The filmmakers clearly hope and aim for the next stop being the Oscars.
Movie
‘Mufasa: The Lion King’ Will Leave You Breathless
“Mufasa: The Lion King” is a visually stunning addition to the beloved Lion King franchise, offering a fresh and emotionally resonant take on the origins of one of Disney’s most iconic characters. The film beautifully explores Mufasa’s journey, balancing heartfelt moments with touches of comedy that lighten the mood and make the story accessible to audiences of all ages. The animation is breathtaking, capturing the vibrant landscapes and lush environments of the Pride Lands, adding depth to Mufasa’s character and his relationships.
The storytelling is compelling, effectively pulling at the heartstrings while providing insights into Mufasa’s character before he becomes the legendary king. However, the setup for Scar’s betrayal feels somewhat underdeveloped, lacking the deeper motivation that could have enriched their complex brotherly relationship. This missed opportunity leaves a slight gap in understanding Scar’s actions, which could have elevated the dramatic stakes.
The musical score is impressive, featuring memorable songs that enhance the emotional impact of pivotal scenes. While there are several standout tracks, one song, in particular, resonates deeply and is sure to linger in viewers’ minds long after the credits roll. Overall, “Mufasa: The Lion King” is an amazing film and a worthy addition to the Lion King lore that manages to deliver both laughter and tears, offering a rich tapestry of storytelling that fans will appreciate.
Movie
Is ‘Kraven the Hunter’ a Total Letdown?
“Kraven the Hunter,” directed by J.C. Chandor, aims to introduce a beloved Spider-Man villain to the big screen, but unfortunately, it falls short of expectations. The film suffers from noticeable issues, notably an overuse of ADR (Automated Dialogue Replacement), which detracts from the authenticity of the characters’ interactions and contributes to an uneven audio experience. This technical flaw is compounded by rough storytelling that feels disjointed and lacking in coherence, leaving viewers struggling to connect with the narrative.
Aaron Taylor-Johnson delivers a commendable performance as Kraven, showcasing the character’s gritty nature and complex motivations. His portrayal has potential, and it’s evident that he could elevate the character far beyond what is presented with a stronger script and direction. However, the absence of Spider-Man, a central figure in Kraven’s lore, leaves a void that the film struggles to fill. Without this critical connection, the plot meanders and fails to create the tension or stakes that fans of the superhero genre crave.
Additionally, including Rhino as a villain feels like a missed opportunity; he is presented more as a gag character with limited screen time, undermining any sense of threat or depth. For the average moviegoer, “Kraven the Hunter” might entertain but ultimately feels like a mediocre viewing experience. Comic book fans, however, may find disappointment in this lackluster attempt to create a solo character film. Instead of an exhilarating dive into Kraven’s world, the film presents a watered-down version, leaving audiences wishing for a more cohesive vision that honors its comic book roots.
Movie
A Brief Review and History of A Year Without a Santa Claus
A Year Without a Santa Claus, the 1974 stop-motion holiday classic produced by Rankin/Bass, is a heartwarming and whimsical tale that has cemented its place in holiday traditions. Based on Phyllis McGinley’s 1956 book, the story revolves around a disheartened Santa Claus who, feeling unappreciated, decides to take a year off from his Christmas duties. It’s up to Mrs. Claus and a pair of well-meaning elves, Jingle and Jangle, to reignite the Christmas spirit and show Santa the world’s unwavering belief in him.
The movie is beloved for its unforgettable characters, especially the bickering Miser Brothers, Snow Miser and Heat Miser. Their catchy, vaudeville-style musical numbers, “Snow Miser Song” and “Heat Miser Song”, are so iconic they’ve become cultural touchstones, often parodied and celebrated decades later.
Directed by Arthur Rankin Jr. and Jules Bass, the film continues the duo’s tradition of stop-motion magic, blending heartfelt storytelling with quirky humor. The voice cast, featuring Mickey Rooney as Santa and Shirley Booth as Mrs. Claus, delivers standout performances. Booth’s warm narration was her final acting role before retirement, adding a layer of poignancy to the film.
Initially released on December 10, 1974, on ABC, the special didn’t immediately achieve the legendary status of Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer. However, it gained a dedicated following through annual holiday airings, nostalgic appeal, and its distinct charm.
The film’s themes of hope, unity, and rekindling joy remain timeless, making it a perennial favorite for audiences of all ages. Its blend of humor, catchy songs, and a touching message about believing in magic and goodwill ensures its enduring legacy during the holiday season.
For fans of holiday classics, A Year Without a Santa Claus is a must-watch that never fails to warm hearts and spread cheer.